The experience of the global network against food crises for strengthening resilience.
This webinar is part of a series of webinars on resilience organized jointly with the EU’s Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DEVCO) and the FAO strategic programme on resilience within the framework of the EU-funded FAO INFORMED programme.
Since 2014 the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission produced an annual report on food insecurity hotspots to allow informed based decisions on food crisis allocations at global level.
In 2016, the European Union, proposed to the FAO and WFP to contribute to the JRC's annual report by providing food insecurity data and analysis. This joint process allowed the publication of a report.
Following the successful experience of the 2016 analysis, the three organizations discussed the opportunity to move forward, involving additional partners, with the aim of producing, from early 2017, a consensus-based yearly report.
EU, WFP and FAO are also promoting the "Global Network against Food Crises", a platform for consensus building on technical analysis and coordination of response.
5. WEBINAR 30/11/2016
THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GLOBAL NETWORK
AGAINST FOOD CRISES FOR STRENGTHENING RESILIENCE
Bernard Rey
European Commission
Directorate Sustainable Growth and Development
Food and Nutrition Security Unit
6. Genesis of the (EU) assessment
6
Evidence-based political decision for food crises related
programming and fund allocation
Need for a coherent and exhaustive (as much as possible)
picture of food crises at a given period;
No automatic trigger response mechanism
Move forward the resilience agenda (Resilience Communication of
Resilience, 2012)
7. Why a global analysis
Global decisions for programming and fund allocation;
Considering all shocks with an impact on FNS at the same time
Climatic shocks, namely the El Niño impact
Armed conflicts and political unrests
Refugees in host countries
Epidemics, like Ebola virus disease
Socioeconomic vulnerability – chronic food insecurity
Market failures
Look at short and long-term trends
Focus on root causes/ resilience building, bridging emergency and
development actions
8. Approach 2016
Needs assessment in terms of food-insecure population
Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) as a reference
for levels of food insecurity
Data from a wide range of sources
Joint analysis of the final data by EC, WFP and FAO
The first report was published by the EU.
9. 2016 report limitations
Static analysis (as in January 2016);
No projection for the coming months;
Limited geo coverage;
Quality of data varies from country to country;
Methods to estimate food insecurity prevalence not homogenous –
maximum effort made to reconcile data across countries but
discrepancies subsist;
EU report isn't yet a public good;
The report was "good enough", to be improved through the Global
Network
10. Opportunity for promoting a public
good
A global analysis of food crises shared by stakeholders do not
exist yet
The global assessment could be of interest for different
stakeholders for different uses
Coherent with the WHS in Istanbul (invest in data analysis,
independent assessments, joint assessments…)
Neutral analysis
Further possible developments besides the analysis
Joint response analysis
Joint planning
Joint implementation
10
11. Added value of a Global Network
Produces a consensus based shared needs analysis;
Promotes shared response analysis;
Enhance partnership, coordination and collaboration;
Promote joint planning;
Pave the way for joint implementation of response;
Promotes political level coordination;
11
16. How the EU used the results of the
Global Assessment in 2016
16
Global response not only related to El Niño
Total EU contribution about €550 million
• Emergency and short-term response €302
million
• Development and long-term €245.5 million
17. Membership of the Global Assessment
• Network of Networks, based on existing analytical processes, no
duplication of analyses
• Confirmed participants
FAO, WFP, UNICEF, EU, FEWS-NET, CILSS, IGAD, SICA
• Institutions already contacted, which interest is to be confirmed
SADC, CEMAC, ASEAN, EU Member States
17
18. Membership of the Global Network
?• To be discussed with partners of the global assessment;
• No concrete steps so far;
• doors opened.
18
19. Recent relevant major events 1/2
19
Date Event Outcome
March "Global analysis of food and nutrition
security situation in food crisis
hotspots" JRC-FAO-WFP report
The report 2016 is
published
April
Brussels
High Level Event "Moving forward:
from food crises to sustainable and
inclusive agriculture growth"
the joint effort EU,
FAO, WFP was
announced
May
Istanbul
WHS Side event "Walking the last
mile: a joint global analysis of food
crises to inform planning and
resource allocation decisions"
the Global Network
was announced by the
EU, FAO and WFP
20. Recent relevant major events 2/2
20
Date Event Outcome
June
Rome
Side event during the Executive
Board Meeting of WFP
WFP Member States
are informed about the
Global Network
Sept
Rome
– 1st "Technical Consultation on
Global Network against Food Crises
and the Global Report"
The structure of the
global assessment is
discussed at technical
level
Nov
Rome
Committee on Food Security (CFS)
side event
CFS partners (MS, Civil
society, etc.) are
informed
21. On-going steps
To be a public good the Global Network requires:
Technical improvement of the
assessment
• Enhancing report quality through technical
consultations
Political impulse to the network
• Enlarging participation to the global analysis from
stakeholders at global level besides the EU, FAO and
WFP
21
24. Calendar coming events
24
Date Event Outcome
Dec Draft of the report 2017 and shared
for comments
The technical
committee peer-review
the draft report
Febr
2016
Publication of the Report 2017 Consensus based
report is public
Febr -
on
Public events for report presentation,
coordination exercise
Global network political
component is active
and coordination
process move forward
25. Key messages from the EU
• Large involvement of stakeholders
• Calendar of the assessment
• Synergy and subsidiarity with existing analysis
• Global assessment (tech) vs global network (pol)
• Global AND local level coordination
25
26. Thank you for your attention
Comments ?
Questions?
Please, write them in
the chat box
THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GLOBAL NETWORK
AGAINST FOOD CRISES FOR STRENGTHENING RESILIENCE
27. Click on the link
and give us your feedback on this webinar
THANK YOU
Editor's Notes
IPC Phase 3+ (Phase 3 or higher) includes Crisis, Emergency and Famine phases. Famine phase is not in the slide because no country or area was classified in that Phase during the analysis period. Cette phase est laissee de cote volontairement dans cette slide pour eviter que l’audience se focalize sur le mot Famine qui a une forte connotation.
See if the text can be shorter
Total countries included in this list are 60
Criteria for inclusion of countries:
GIEWS criteria* based on countries experiencing the following two conditions:
1 food crisis in the last 3 years/ or
3 food crises in the last 10 years
*GIEWS criteria/methodology: it monitors food crises according to the predominant factor driving them; countries requiring external assistance for food are classified into three categories: countries with (1) exceptional shortfall in aggregate food production/supplies; (2) widespread lack of access; and (3) severe localized food insecurity.
Countries included in this list are a total of 23 countries. As part of Syria analysis, the regional refugees crisis is included with analysis of refugees population in neighboring countries (Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey)
Criteria for inclusion:
Countries in IPC Phase 4 or 5; and/or
Countries with at least 20% or more of the population in IPC Phase 3
An additional section of the report will include a short analysis of countries that have faced a localized crises, or are vulnerable to recurrent localized crises, or are at risk of upcoming crisis. Examples of these countries include Kenya, Myanmar, Mali, Lybia, Korea, Dem. P. Rep., Ukraine, Central America Dry Corridor (including Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala)